GoldenEye: Source Forums

Editing and Customization => General Discussion => Topic started by: Rick Astley on June 10, 2011, 01:11:18 am

Title: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Rick Astley on June 10, 2011, 01:11:18 am
i was wondering what will not be included in Goldeneye Source?
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: namajnaG on June 10, 2011, 01:15:11 am
Everything that is not in the game.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Mangley on June 10, 2011, 01:18:24 am
Giant robots.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Rick Astley on June 10, 2011, 01:19:55 am
i was thinking of stuff like the classic Crosshairs or All Bonds or stuff like that
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: coolDisguise on June 10, 2011, 02:42:41 am
Daniel Craig.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: namajnaG on June 10, 2011, 07:37:27 am
i was thinking of stuff like the classic Crosshairs or All Bonds or stuff like that

The classic crosshair is there, Its just thicker.

Daniel Craig.

QFT
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: kraid on June 10, 2011, 04:08:35 pm
i was wondering what will not be included in Goldeneye Source?
A Nazi-Zombie Game mode.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: namajnaG on June 10, 2011, 04:50:23 pm
Bloody screens.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Gabbo on June 10, 2011, 05:12:20 pm
Regenerating health and 3rd person cover
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Jeron [SharpSh00tah] on June 10, 2011, 05:13:20 pm
Three Toed Sloths
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: namajnaG on June 10, 2011, 06:07:35 pm
Killer monkeys in Jungle.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Jeron [SharpSh00tah] on June 10, 2011, 07:16:31 pm
Killer monkeys in Jungle.

BUT, there will be Jungle, and Killer Monkey :P
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: namajnaG on June 10, 2011, 08:18:24 pm
BUT, there will be Jungle, and Killer Monkey :P

Hehehe, Yeah, But there won't be killer monkeys with silver PP7s in the trees.
Unless...
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Ruone Delacroix on June 10, 2011, 10:18:39 pm
You won't see Nukes, Choppers (other than the Tiger, I'm sure), or yearly "expansions".
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: killermonkey on June 10, 2011, 11:40:04 pm
You won't see downloadable content for $15.99

You will see killer monkeys in the trees though....
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Kratos on June 11, 2011, 01:08:52 am
Daniel Craig.

ROFL

+10

You wont see Duke Nukem strippers!
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: namajnaG on June 11, 2011, 02:06:11 am
You will see killer monkeys in the trees though....

I expect voice acting.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Rick Astley on June 11, 2011, 02:13:43 am
Personally i dont think Daniel Craig's Bond should be in the game mainly for more than one reasons- he already has his goldeneye game (sorry i mean COD game) and well they should just have the classic bonds: Connery, Moore and Dalton (which were in the original n64 game until they were removed at the last minute....there are still alot of easter eggs of them all- the n64 booklet shows Connery and a bit of Daltons Tux and there are pictures via a gameshark code.

personally unless we can find good voiceactors which sound familiar to Pierce (i can do a great Sean Bean Impersonation)
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: namajnaG on June 11, 2011, 02:37:49 am
Again, I doubt that we can do that, Due to legal issues.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Rick Astley on June 11, 2011, 03:04:45 am
Again, I doubt that we can do that, Due to legal issues.

if you can do it with Pierce...we just have a vague look a like that doesnt resemble the actors...Sean just has a White Tux, Tim has a stern pissed off look and Roger well..anything is possible they could be called anything example:

Sean is Dr. Jones
Tim is Lord President
Roger is Saint John Smith
idk its an idea i just really want them to be in the game :(
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: rsully on June 11, 2011, 04:07:05 am
i was wondering what will not be included in Goldeneye Source?
A steady player base.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Ruone Delacroix on June 11, 2011, 05:24:56 am
A steady player base.

That's a bit pessimistic. Have some faith for a while longer.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Jeron [SharpSh00tah] on June 12, 2011, 08:26:39 pm
A steady player base.

lmfao. looks like u need to help make one
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Conmore on June 19, 2012, 12:32:31 pm
Hopefully we won't have homophobic 11 year olds who cry when they get killed and saying their birthday is an excuse for us not to shoot them
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: kraid on June 19, 2012, 02:00:42 pm
^^Don't worry they're busy playing the newest CoD.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: killermonkey on June 19, 2012, 06:54:20 pm
To answer the actual question....

v4.2 will NOT feature Launch Code, single player, natalya, xenia, taser boy, or death animations.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: terps4life90 on June 20, 2012, 12:35:46 am
To answer the actual question....

v4.2 will NOT feature natalya.

That is embarrassing she isn't done yet.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Mangley on June 20, 2012, 01:55:30 am
Find us character artists.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Jonathon [SSL] on June 20, 2012, 01:57:27 am
That is embarrassing she isn't done yet.

It's more a matter of, bug Loafie so that he'll send us the character model(s) he finished but never sent anyone. There's quite a few of them.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Troy on June 20, 2012, 03:59:05 am
I think it would be a wise decision to replace the female scientist with Natalya.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: namajnaG on June 20, 2012, 06:50:54 am
I think it would be a wise decision to replace the female scientist with Natalya.

Now, Removing a finished character from the game would be pretty stupid, Considering its the only female character on MI6.
Even if Natalya was there, Diversity is good.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: CCsaint10 on June 20, 2012, 06:54:17 am
I think it would be a wise decision to replace the female scientist with Natalya.

Don't you be hatin on my girl.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Kratos on June 20, 2012, 07:06:27 am
I think it would be a wise decision to replace the female scientist with Natalya.

and add bigger breasts please!
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Troy on June 20, 2012, 07:08:49 am
Let us remember that Natalya was in Goldeneye 64 as the female scientist was not.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: terps4life90 on June 20, 2012, 09:52:20 am
Find us character artists.

No excuse.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: kraid on June 20, 2012, 01:28:31 pm
Don't you be hatin on my girl.

If i remember correctly, she was was Spiders GF.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: The Cy on June 20, 2012, 03:19:53 pm
It's more a matter of, bug Loafie so that he'll send us the character model(s) he finished but never sent anyone. There's quite a few of them.

I´ve never understood why some people leave just like that. if you´re right with your assumption, he has the damn duty to send the files to the rest of the team, so that they have the chance to finish his work. leaving and deliver nothing is just a bad habit, even if they´re doing it for free. all hat and no cattle. I suppose he did the same thing with his map ge_temple, didn´t he?
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Jonathon [SSL] on June 20, 2012, 03:35:18 pm
I´ve never understood why some people leave just like that. if you´re right with your assumption, he has the damn duty to send the files to the rest of the team, so that they have the chance to finish his work. leaving and deliver nothing is just a bad habit, even if they´re doing it for free. all hat and no cattle. I suppose he did the same thing with his map ge_temple, didn´t he?

I'm pretty sure he went on to do bigger and better things. He doesn't HAVE to do anything for the mod. But he completed a lot of really great characters that we never got.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: killermonkey on June 20, 2012, 03:45:42 pm
I sent him a message on Facebook, with any luck I can remove natalya from the undeliverables list.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Kratos on June 21, 2012, 01:21:15 am
I sent him a message on Facebook, with any luck I can remove natalya from the undeliverables list.

OH GOSH PLEASE DO SIR.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: CCsaint10 on June 21, 2012, 01:37:13 am
If i remember correctly, she was was Spiders GF.

I don't give a shit if she is Spiders GF, she is ma girl! WHO ARE YOU TO SAY OTHERWISE! HOW DARE YOU!

Who cares if the female science wasn't in ges. Female scientist>Natalya
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: major on June 21, 2012, 01:42:17 am
I call Mayday.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Troy on June 21, 2012, 04:18:59 am
After some further research, I found out that the female scientist was only available in the multi-player version of Goldeneye 64.  So to correct my statement, she was in Goldeneye 64 but not in the single player version.

http://goldeneye.wikia.com/wiki/Scientist_%28Female%29 (http://goldeneye.wikia.com/wiki/Scientist_%28Female%29)

The GE:S model doesn't look like the picture here:

(http://gepdhq.tripod.com/goldeneyehq/images/gec12.jpg) (http://gepdhq.tripod.com/goldeneyehq/images/gec12.jpg)
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: kraid on June 21, 2012, 10:42:33 am
Are we really debatting about the look of generic characters now?
She's female, she looks like a scientist, what else could you ask for?
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: namajnaG on June 21, 2012, 03:39:03 pm
Are we really debatting about the look of generic characters now?
She's female, she looks like a scientist, what else could you ask for?

QFT, Let's please move on to different matters now.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Troy on June 21, 2012, 06:14:11 pm
Are we really debatting about the look of generic characters now?
It was just a picture that I found on a site of the original look.

She's female, she looks like a scientist, what else could you ask for?
How about Dr. Doak?
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Rodney 1.666 on June 22, 2012, 12:26:56 am
I knew there was at least one female scientist somewhere..

How about Dr. Doak?

Indeed.
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: tg99 on August 09, 2012, 08:53:08 pm
Are we really debatting about the look of generic characters now?
She's female, she looks like a scientist, what else could you ask for?

Its pretty dam simple everyone a women has, Boobs and an Ass end of story
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Peroxwhy?gen on August 10, 2012, 01:05:37 am
One thing is for sure.. Dr. Doak needs to look exactly the same or else.. ill flip a tit. :)
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Rick Astley on August 10, 2012, 01:27:43 am
as a kid i thought he was called Doctor Dock
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Rick Astley on August 10, 2012, 01:33:51 am
but for charater artists did the team ever decided to look into polycount for possible recruitment
and wasnt Launch Code released for V4.2?
Title: Re: So what will not be in Goldeneye Source?
Post by: Peroxwhy?gen on August 17, 2012, 05:40:54 am
Something that should definitely be added, is the ability to damage the body armor when shot/exploded to give you less armor points. Also to be able to throw remote mines on ammo packs, to give other players a scare "like oh shit i might explode into a million pieces if i pick that ammo crate*. Classic Goldeneye :)