GoldenEye: Source Forums
Debriefing => General Goldeneye => Topic started by: mbsurfer on January 21, 2008, 06:15:41 am
-
Yes folks, it appears that we are not completely dead!!! :D :D
At Midnight EST of Monday, January 21, 2008 the main page of GoldenEye: Source's website was updated! I'm waiting for an official announcement or something, but discuss the look of the new site here until the announcement is posted.
Long live GE:S.
(http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d96/mbsurfer/WTF.jpg)
-
I did a double take when I saw the new front page.
Very nice.
-
Very badass....
-
Ya there will be a news update soon with in the next couple days we are just finishing up somethings for it. But you guys will like what is coming.
-
Awesome! Looks great. I like it. If only it could be XHTML (strict :P) valid. There is even the Doctype commented in the source ;)
-
Loooks schweet, can the same be done for the forum?
-
Awesome! Looks great. I like it. If only it could be XHTML (strict :P) valid. There is even the Doctype commented in the source ;)
I'm sure I could sort that no problem ;)
-
Haha, nice, I didn't see that coming. Glad to see the site finally got uploaded.
-
<<insert Wayne and Garth "EXCELLENT!" here >>
-
Classic Goldeneye look. Great job on that.
-
<<insert Wayne and Garth "EXCELLENT!" here >>
Zang
-
pitty its all static content with no cms backing like the other prototype we had working.
-
Still *looks* great, for a mod website
Solid work janus
-
Even the "Inactive Devs" are Alive! ;D
-
Lets hope Perfect Dark: Source is following suit. Whatever happened to GE:S's site months ago may have happened to PD:S's site just now. :-\ www.pdark-mod.com.
-
I thought I was at the wrong site. I was expecting the drab, shabby, Ed Wood-esque looking one. Instead I got something actually pleasing to look at it. Brava.
-
I hate to be annoying. This is a pretty good website with a (very) good looking, but OMG! the source is awful! The doctype is not valid (http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fgoldeneyesource.com%2F%3Fpage%3Dabout). And why a <table> is used for the layout???? It's out of date!
You guys really should try to have a xhtml valid website with full css layout (< br /> here and there, alt="" in <img />, move <script> in head or body, etc...). I know it's not very popular, coz there are not a lot of html-standards fanatic here :P But it's useful (http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2004/xhtml-faq#need).
That said, again, very good looking :)
-
It doesnt break.. you know the saying? :P
-
I hate to be annoying. This is a pretty good website with a (very) good looking, but OMG! the source is awful! The doctype is not valid (http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fgoldeneyesource.com%2F%3Fpage%3Dabout). And why a <table> is used for the layout???? It's out of date!
You guys really should try to have a xhtml valid website with full css layout (< br /> here and there, alt="" in <img />, move <script> in head or body, etc...). I know it's not very popular, coz there are not a lot of html-standards fanatic here :P But it's useful (http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2004/xhtml-faq#need).
That said, again, very good looking :)
There's a table? Oh dear I really didn't see that haha. I'll remove it and clean it up for you ;)
-
Haha thanks man.
-
Bad...bad, stop butchering the poor people and let them work on the mod ::) :P
-
Bad...bad, stop butchering the poor people and let them work on the mod ::) :P
We don't really talk about the mod here. We just pretend it's being worked on.