Debriefing > Impressions & Feedback
Goldeneye Source competitive or not
killermonkey:
I find GE:S to take a lot more skill - TO WIN - then most other games. I can be leader on TF2 board without much effort (be engie with a well placed sentry or a n00bed up HW guy). Our game is a different breed of skill, you have to use the weapon set, map, and aimer together with skill and a little twitchiness if you even want to think about placing on the round report with anyone of equal or greater skill then you.
Even then, even a n00b can place highly if they are on a good streak with the GG
VC:
Thought they won't make top-spot if a skilled player is around because he'll keep up in the frag race using lead until your luck runs out of bars, unless you manage to milk one inning through the whole round.
And really, is there anyone skilled enough to pull that off?
jjmusicnotes:
the only way it might be conceivably plausible depends on the difference in skill between the n00b and the skilled player.
case and point: myself vs. VC in Temple classic = NFC
VC:
Hey, I died twice. Dropped my ratio from infinity to 51 with that. : (
And then on that 25-0 Cradle round, no one used the AuG enough to get it to show as favorite weapon. Silly RC-P90 deathbeam...
Doc.NO:
--- Quote from: Viashino Cutthroat on March 18, 2009, 04:05:27 pm ---Silly RC-P90 deathbeam...
--- End quote ---
QFT, wonder who coded weapon stuff...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version